Paste your MLA 8 Works Cited list and get an MLA 9 version back. The refined container model and updated guidance are applied automatically.
Tip: paste up to 100 entries at once. Plain-text references should be separated by blank lines. Try an example:
The Bulk Citation Converter handles every direction between major styles — and any of the 10,000+ CSL styles in between. A few of the most common conversions writers run into:
Switching disciplines or moving from a humanities course to a
social-science journal? Paste your MLA Works Cited list (in plain
text, BibTeX, or RIS) and the converter rewrites every entry as
APA 7 — author initials, sentence-case titles, italicized journal
names, and full https://doi.org/ links — in one click.
Going the other way? Drop in your APA reference list and get a properly formatted MLA 9 Works Cited, with full first names, title case, and the MLA container model applied to journals, anthologies, and websites.
Chicago notes-and-bibliography and Chicago author-date entries both convert cleanly to APA 7. The tool also handles APA → Chicago for history, theology, and humanities papers that require notes-and-bib formatting.
Harvard and APA share an author-date system but differ in punctuation, ampersand use, and DOI formatting. Paste a Harvard reference list to get a clean APA 7 version — or convert APA to Harvard if your institution uses the Harvard variant.
Export from Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote, or Google Scholar and paste
the file contents directly. The converter auto-detects BibTeX
(@article) and RIS (TY - JOUR) and
renders them in your target style.
Click More in the style picker for AMA, Vancouver, IEEE, Optica, ACS, Nature, Cell, and 10,000+ other journal styles backed by the Citation Style Language (CSL) registry.
Need a single citation rather than a bulk conversion? Paste a DOI, ISBN, URL, or title into the Citation Generator and get one fully formatted reference in any style.
Before converting a list, make sure every reference is real. The Citation Checker verifies each entry against Crossref, Semantic Scholar, and PubMed.
Missing a citation entirely? Find Source searches academic databases for peer-reviewed papers that support a claim.
Not sure which style your assignment wants? Compare APA vs MLA, APA vs Chicago, MLA vs Chicago, and Harvard vs APA.
The in-depth guides on APA, MLA, Chicago, and Harvard cover the rules behind each format the converter outputs.
Send a converted list straight to your Works Cited library to keep every project's reference list in one place — and re-export later in any style.
Same converter, different style pair. Pick the direction you need:
Update an APA 6 reference list to APA 7 in one paste.
Switch an APA reference list to MLA 9 in one paste.
Switch a Chicago bibliography to MLA 9 in one paste.
Paste a .bib file and get an MLA 9 Works Cited list.
Paste a .ris file → MLA 9 Works Cited list.
MLA 9, published in 2021, refines rather than overhauls MLA 8. The container model that MLA 8 introduced in 2016 is preserved; MLA 9 mostly tightens the guidance, adds inclusive-language conventions, expands the treatment of digital and audiovisual sources, and clarifies the in-text annotation rules. For most reference lists, MLA 8 → MLA 9 is closer to a copy-edit than a structural conversion — most entries look identical in both editions, with a few categories (websites, AV materials, social-media posts) seeing the most visible updates.
Paste your MLA 8 Works Cited list and the converter parses each entry into structured fields and re-renders in MLA 9. Where MLA 9 changed the recommended punctuation or container handling, the new convention takes over; where it left things alone, the entry looks the same. The conversion is safe in the sense that an MLA 9 entry rendered from MLA 8 input is also a valid MLA 8 entry — the two editions are forward-compatible.
.bib file from Zotero, Mendeley, JabRef, or Overleaf and paste the contents in. @article, @book, @inproceedings, @misc, and the long tail of BibTeX entry types are all recognized.TY - JOUR block and every entry parses.Most online tools handle one citation at a time. Fine if you have one reference. Nightmare if you have eighty. The Bulk Converter runs the whole list as a single pass, which is what gets you consistency: same date format, same author rule, same DOI prefix, same italicization across every entry. That's the thing reviewers actually notice. A list that's almost consistent reads worse than one that's clearly wrong.
Submitted to Nature, got a desk reject, redirecting to Cell? Different style guide. Paste the original reference list and reformat in the target journal's style without rewriting a single entry by hand.
Universities each have their own thesis style guide. Convert your finished bibliography from APA, MLA, or Chicago into your institution's required style in one paste.
Export .bib or .ris from your reference manager and convert the contents to a clean Works Cited list in your manuscript's style — no plug-in, no Word-add-in setup.
Co-authoring across fields? The medical co-author wants AMA, the engineering co-author wants IEEE, the humanities co-author wants Chicago. Convert each section into the agreed-on house style for the target venue in one click.
Re-using a reference list from an earlier paper but the journal has updated to APA 7? Bulk-convert APA 6 → APA 7 to pick up the sentence-case titles, full DOI URLs, and updated author conventions.
Have a reading list in BibTeX from a course? Convert it to APA or MLA so you can drop it into your own bibliography as you write — no transcription, no errors.
Most journals and courses now require MLA 9, but MLA 8 is structurally compatible — a paper submitted in MLA 8 won't be rejected for using the old edition, unless the venue explicitly requires MLA 9. The biggest reason to update is consistency: if any part of your paper follows MLA 9 (because your instructor's template uses it, or because newer entries you added are MLA 9), the whole bibliography should match.
The container model from MLA 8 is preserved. The visible changes: refined guidance on URLs (use https:// form, and DOI URLs are preferred over plain URLs when both are available); inclusive-language guidance on pronoun usage and gender-neutral language; expanded treatment of social-media posts and audiovisual sources; clarified handling of contributors beyond the primary author (translators, editors, performers, directors).
Generally no. Both MLA 8 and MLA 9 use (Author page) parenthetical citations with the same rules for 1, 2, and 3+ authors. MLA 9 clarifies a few edge cases — citing audiovisual time stamps, citing tweets and social-media posts — but for the standard book and article citations that make up most papers, the in-text form doesn't change.
Harvard and APA share an author-date system but disagree on punctuation, ampersand use, the order of elements, and whether DOIs come as bare strings or full URLs. Paste any Harvard list and the converter normalizes to APA 7. APA to Harvard works the other way if your institution uses one of the Harvard variants (Cite Them Right, Anglia Ruskin, others).
Yes. Export from Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote, JabRef, Overleaf, or any database that supports BibTeX or RIS, and paste the file contents in. The converter auto-detects the format — looking for @article or @book on the BibTeX side, TY - JOUR on the RIS side — and renders the entries in your chosen style.
Click More in the style picker. You'll get AMA, ACS, IEEE, Vancouver, Optica, Nature, Cell, JAMA, BMJ, plus 10,000+ other journal- and discipline-specific styles. All backed by the Citation Style Language (CSL) registry, the same registry Zotero and Mendeley use under the hood.
For well-formatted bibliographies in any major style, accuracy sits in the high 90s. Edge cases that sometimes want a touch-up: very old reference lists with hand-typed inconsistencies, non-Latin-script entries (Cyrillic, Chinese), house styles that mix numbered and author-date conventions in the same list. The converter shows you the parsed fields alongside the formatted output, so you can catch an entry that looks off before it ships.
Practically no. Lists of 100+ entries are routine. For very long bibliographies (500+), break them into batches of a few hundred. The response stays snappy and you can spot any parser hiccups before they propagate. Each batch is independent — no ordering or consistency penalty for splitting.
No. Pasted bibliographies live in memory while the request runs and are gone once the response returns. We don't retain the input, the parsed records, or the formatted output beyond the active session. Nothing trains a model. The privacy policy spells the specifics out.
The converter runs on the citation processor itself — no AI credits required. Conversion is free. You may see a prompt to sign in if you want to save converted lists to your Works Cited library, but the conversion stays free either way. Top-up packs for the AI-powered tools live on the pricing page.
AI-powered features require an account. The Citation Generator stays free forever.